Home » Foreign Forces » Security Experts Worry About Russia’s Increasing Actions Abroad Despite Sanctions

Security Experts Worry About Russia’s Increasing Actions Abroad Despite Sanctions

With Vladimir Putin in office for another six years, international security experts agree relations between the United States and Russia could sink even lower than they are now and that the danger of conflict between the nuclear giants is greater than it was in the darkest days of the Cold War.

Speaking at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., Strobe Talbott, a former senior State Department official in the Clinton administration, said Russia “is ratcheting up the arms race” at the same time as “we are not seeing anything of arms control” as existing treaties are being ignored or allowed to lapse.

“Putin has a lot to crow about … beyond the rigged election” on March 18 – from assertiveness in the Syrian civil war and the greater Middle East to a possible visit to the White House after his victory at the polls to better economic and military relations with China, Talbott said at the April 4 event.

Julia Ioffe, a writer at the Atlantic Magazine, said Putin saw the Syrian civil war as “a way to muscle his way back” into the international arena following harsh sanctions Europe and the United States laid on Moscow in 2010 and have since increased to curb Russian aggressiveness outside its borders. The sanctions and increased defense spending in NATO were in response to Moscow’s annexation of Crimea and the continued military backing of separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Even with the nomination of CIA Director Mike Pompeo to become the next secretary of State and John Bolton to move in as the national security adviser, the Kremlin sees an opening in the Trump administration to divide the West and blunt future responses to its adventurism, Ioffe said. Pompeo and Bolton, both known for their hard-line approach to Moscow, are also “obsessed with terrorism,” which allows Putin “the perfect opportunity to play the counterterrorism card” as he did in Syria – though she noted Putin ultimately has not provided much help in the fight against the Islamic State.

Talbott and others mentioned the poisoning of former Russian military intelligence officer turned British informant Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Great Britain, said Talbott said the poisonings were a reminder to former Russian intelligence officials not to talk to the West. The Kremlin has publicly blamed the CIA and MI6, the United Kingdom’s intelligence agency, for the attacks as part of its disinformation campaign. Talbott said the idea behind those claims “is to lie and confuse people” about what really happened and who committed the crime.

Though many draw comparisons between today’s Russia and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, Angela Stent, director of the Center for Eurasian, Russian, and East European Studies at Georgetown University, noted some differences.

“Russia is not isolated” as the Soviet Union was, she said, citing the close energy ties between Western Europe and Russia despite the continuing sanctions as a demonstration of economic integration; the improving personal relations between Putin and China’s Xi Jinping even though “Russia is the junior partner” in countering the United States; and the country’s ability to work with India on a number of projects that are not covered by the sanctions.

“Mr. Putin is in Turkey with Mr. [Recep Tayyip] Erdogan and Iran,” Stent said.
“Look at Latin America,” where Russia is trying to expand its influence beyond Cuba and Venezuela through trade agreements.

Later, in answer to a question, Stent added, “Russia has taken over in the Middle East” from the United States. Moscow “is viewed as an honest broker” and is able to communicate with both Sunnis and Shias as well as with Israel on issues of importance to the region.

“Russia is there to stay,” she said.

As for the March 18 presidential election, Vladimir Kara-Murza, chairman of the Boris Nemtsov Foundation and vice chairman of the Open Russia Foundation, called it a sham. Russia “is the Potemkin village of democracy” where real opposition candidates have been killed or kept off the ballot and ballot-stuffing and voter intimidation are widespread.

“The outcome was never in doubt” in a campaign where Putin used increasingly bellicose rhetoric, saying Russia has new cruise missiles capable of getting through all American defenses to hit their assigned targets.

Kara-Murza, who was poisoned himself and is a vocal opponent of Putin, said the level of repression in Russia is higher now than in the waning days of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s. Using international metrics, he said 146 people are being held as political prisoners now compared to 126 then.

Much of this crackdown “is directed at the Crimean Tatar community,” which opposed the seizure of the peninsula from Ukraine.

  • Ed L

    That sounds about right, coupled with the numerous patriotic Russian movies and TV shows that Have been coming out of Russia for the last few years

    • D. Jones

      They are starting out with an unproven premise. From the link: “How can Washington manage a coherent Russia policy amidst the unfolding and politically explosive investigations into Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 election?”

      “Politically explosive investigations”? One would think Uranium One is worthy of note, yet not mentioned.

      Even more remarkable is the inclusion of a former asset (Talbot) of the SVR (see Wiki, Washington Post or just search Talbot on the web for details).

      A thorough (or even casual) review of the c.v. of the “panel of experts” raises legitimate questions about their expertise and objectivity.

      • Duane

        The so called Uranium One scandal has been completely debunked numerous times. Even the totally corrupted Attorney General, the abused yet servile guy that Trump orders around like an abused puppy dog, has declined to investigate what everyone who is not a Fox News groupie knows to be a made up right wingnut conspiracy theory.

        • muzzleloader

          The Uranium One scandal has not been debunked, it has been buried. And like a typical liberal, you think that anyone who serves in the Trump administration is “corrupt”, and anyone who doesn’t think like you is a right wing nut.
          I guess this is your weekly I hate Trump vent. Feel better now ?

  • Corporatski Kittenbot 2.0

    What is the collective noun for neo-cons?


  • Chesapeakeguy

    Did I read that right? The one so-called ‘expert’ says that Israel views Russia as an ‘honest broker’? So much for any credibility to this ‘discussion’.

    Russia behaving badly is news? And of course, that has only happened since Trump became POTUS! Yeah, right. Should we go to war with Russia? Syrian and Russian alliance goes back a generation. It didn’t just happen. Seeing how NOBODY could tell enemy and ‘rebel’ apart (anyone else remember how millions of dollars of spending on ‘training’ resulted in something like FOUR ‘soldiers’ being produced several years ago? Hmmm?), the fact that ISIS is just about wiped out is a significant accomplishment. Assad is still there. He seems pretty resilient to ‘lines in the sand’. Keep the economic screws on Russia and things will be OK. Keep on FRACKING! Oil is the only thing the Russians have. Given the scandal of the uranium deal we signed with them, are we still honoring that? Cut it off as well. They will only be able to rattle their swords in the areas they are already strong in, and that ain’t many beyond their own borders.

  • SFC Steven M Barry USA RET

    If there is increasing “danger of conflict” with Russia it will be because of mouthbreathers like the Brookings Institution and the warmongering of the US.

  • Yamanote

    Would love to see more comments on this from the Russian trolls that infect USNI’s comments section. Note to trolls: SEAL experience in your profile is a red flag.