Home » Budget Industry » Pentagon 2018 Nuclear Posture Review

Pentagon 2018 Nuclear Posture Review

The following is the 2018 Department of Defense Nuclear Posture Review that was released on Feb. 2, 2018. This post has been updated to include a revised version of the NPR that has corrected a graphics error.

From the Report:

On January 27, 2017, President Donald Trump directed Secretary of Defense James Mattis to initiate a new Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). The President made clear that his first priority is to protect the United States, allies, and partners. He also emphasized both the long-term goal of eliminating nuclear weapons and the requirement that the United States have modern, flexible, and resilient nuclear capabilities that are safe and secure until such a time as nuclear weapons can prudently be eliminated from the world.

The United States remains committed to its efforts in support of the ultimate global elimination of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. It has reduced the nuclear stockpile by over 85 percent since the height of the Cold War and deployed no new nuclear capabilities for over two decades. Nevertheless, global threat conditions have worsened markedly since the most recent 2010 NPR, including increasingly explicit nuclear threats from potential adversaries. The United States now faces a more diverse and advanced nuclear-threat environment than ever before, with considerable dynamism in potential adversaries’ development and deployment programs for nuclear weapons and delivery systems.

An Evolving and Uncertain International Security Environment

While the United States has continued to reduce the number and salience of nuclear weapons, others, including Russia and China, have moved in the opposite direction. They have added new types of nuclear capabilities to their arsenals, increased the salience of nuclear forces in their strategies and plans, and engaged in increasingly aggressive behavior, including in outer space and cyber space. North Korea continues its illicit pursuit of nuclear weapons and missile capabilities in direct violation of United Nations (U.N.) Security Council resolutions. Iran has agreed to constraints on its nuclear program in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Nevertheless, it retains the technological capability and much of the capacity necessary to develop a nuclear weapon within one year of a decision to do so.

There now exists an unprecedented range and mix of threats, including major conventional, chemical, biological, nuclear, space, and cyber threats, and violent non-state actors. These developments have produced increased uncertainty and risk.This rapid deterioration of the threat environment since the 2010 NPR must now shape our thinking as we formulate policy and strategy, and initiate the sustainment and replacement of U.S. nuclear forces. This 2018 NPR assesses previous nuclear policies and requirements that were established amid a more benign nuclear environment and more amicable Great Power relations. It focuses on identifying the nuclear policies, strategy, and corresponding capabilities needed to protect America in the deteriorating threat environment that confronts the United States, allies, and partners. It is strategy driven and provides guidance for the nuclear force posture and policy requirements needed now and in the future.

The United States does not wish to regard either Russia or China as an adversary and seeks stable relations with both. We have long sought a dialogue with China to enhance our understanding of our respective nuclear policies, doctrine, and capabilities; to improve transparency; and to help manage the risks of miscalculation and misperception. We hope that China will share this interest and that meaningful dialogue can commence. The United States and Russia have in the past maintained strategic dialogues to manage nuclear competition and nuclear risks. Given Russian actions, including its occupation of Crimea, this constructive engagement has declined substantially. We look forward to conditions that would once again allow for transparent and constructive engagement with Russia.

Nevertheless, this review candidly addresses the challenges posed by Russian, Chinese, and other states’ strategic policies, programs, and capabilities, particularly nuclear. It presents the flexible, adaptable, and resilient U.S. nuclear capabilities now required to protect the United States, allies, and partners, and promote strategic stability.

  • kye154

    The U.S. is loosing its grip internationally, and its why its flailing round, and posturing itself for nuclear confrontations. While being too focused on warfare, America has lost sight of its economy, upkeep of its infrastructure, and maintaining the value of its currency, and has accumulated a huge debt of over $20 trillion. Iran, China, and Russia, are all pulling away from the use of the American dollar as an international fiat currency, and soon, the OPEC countries will do the same. When that happens, the dollar will become worthlessin trade and the American economy will tank over night, and wake up the following morning as a third world country. America will also have no way to pay for that marvelous military it has, or to pay its soldiers and sailors, much less, buy the fuel needed to operate it. America becomes totally irrelevant at that point, and Russia and China will dominate the landscape without having to fire a shot in a military confrontation with the U.S.,. The dollar is really the lynchpin of keeping America strong and viable, not just solely nuclear capability, and that is what this report misses.

    • [rabh

      Russian Kanyon can deliver 100 megaton nuclear torpedo. Russia and China aren’t lowering their nuclear arsenal only modernizing it and improving their capabilities. I wish we lived in a world without nuclear weapons. We got rid of 80% of our Nuclear Arsenal, while our adversaries only increased theirs. Russia main source of GDP is fossil fuels, and soon as the world moves toward clean energy. They don’t have anything in place to sustain themselves with. Obama was able to lower the deficit to around 400 billion, but under Trump we will see it to be over 1 trillion a year.