Home » Budget Industry » GAO Report on Amphibious Operations Training


GAO Report on Amphibious Operations Training

The following is the Government Accountability Office Dec. 1, 2017, Navy and Marine Corps Training: Further PLanning Needed for Amphibious Operations Training.

From the Report

Navy and Marine Corps units that are deploying as part of an Amphibious Ready Group and Marine Expeditionary Unit (ARG-MEU) completed their required training for amphibious operations, but other Marine Corps units have been limited in their ability to conduct training for other amphibious operations–related priorities. GAO found that several factors, to include the decline in the fleet of the Navy’s amphibious ships from 62 in 1990 to 31 today limited the ability of Marine Corps units to conduct training for other priorities, such as recurring training for home-station units (see figure). As a result, training completion for amphibious operations was low for some but not all Marine Corps units from fiscal years 2014 through 2016. The services have taken steps to address amphibious training shortfalls, such as more comprehensively determining units that require training. However, these efforts are incomplete because the services do not have an approach to prioritize available training resources, evaluate training resource alternatives, and monitor progress towards achieving priorities. Thus, the services are not well positioned to mitigate any training shortfalls.

GAO Image

The Navy and Marine Corps have taken some steps to improve coordination between the two services, but have not fully incorporated leading collaboration practices to improve integration of the two services—naval integration—for amphibious operations. For example, the Navy and Marine Corps have not defined and articulated common outcomes for naval integration that would help them align efforts to maximize training opportunities for amphibious operations.

The Marine Corps has taken steps to better integrate virtual training devices into operational training, but gaps remain in its process to develop and use them. GAO found that for selected virtual training devices, the Marine Corps did not conduct front-end analysis that considered key factors, such as the specific training tasks that a device would accomplish; consider device usage data to support its investment decisions; or evaluate the effectiveness of existing virtual training devices because of weaknesses in the service’s guidance. As a result, the Marine Corps risks investing in devices that are not cost-effective and whose value to operational training is undetermined.

  • Ed L

    This is all a sham. A deliberate decline in our amphibious forces and logistics fleet. Not to mention the rest of the fleet. All for lining people pockets instead of SLEP’s being perform on vessels with sound hulls They were just Sunk or let decline till they were beyond repair. Thank You Presidents, Clinton, Bush and Obama.

    • Rob C.

      I was in the armed forces when 1st President Bush was in office. I can tell you BRAC and fleet draw down was happening as soon as Wall fell and USSR started deteriorate. The ENTIRE Congress was on trying get money tied into the military for their own objectives. It wasn’t just 1 or 2 setting presidents. It was the entire shooting match of politicians except for the ones who’s states were going suffer because of the organization of the Military.