Home » Military Personnel » Master Chief Selection Board Scrapped Over Collusion Allegations; Investigation Ongoing 

Master Chief Selection Board Scrapped Over Collusion Allegations; Investigation Ongoing 

A sailor has his master chief petty officer collar device pinned during a promotion ceremony. US Navy Photo

The Navy is investigating allegations that a group of senior enlisted sailors colluded to influence the results of a selection board for the service’s next crop of E-9s, USNI News has learned.

Navy Personnel Command received an anonymous tip on Tuesday alleging some members of the 120 person board were communicating with those outside the board process to unduly favor some candidates for Master Chief over others.

“Enough information was validated to warrant further investigation by the Navy. As such, the Navy adjourned the board on April 12, 2017, and invalidated the incomplete results,” read a statement from Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen
“The Navy takes this incident very seriously and is investigating these allegations of wrong-doing by some board members.”

The board, which was convened on April 3 in Millington, Tenn., was tasked with reviewing the records of 3,418 Senior Chiefs for 506 slots for Master Chief.

Navy selection boards are designed to wring out personal biases and make promotion decisions based solely on documented performance and the needs of the service. That means any communication outside of the selection proceedings is cause to invalidate the process and start again.

In 2012, a clerical error that released information on the selection process ahead of schedule postponed the convening of an E-9 selection board by a month. In 2005 a Senior Chief selection board was invalidated because an unofficial list circulated via email, reported Navy Times on Wednesday.

However, the allegations received by NPC in this instance are more serious.

“It involved a few members. What got out was there were communications during the board,” a source familiar with the investigation told USNI News on Thursday.
“The tip was talking about allegations in which board members were communicating with people during the board selections.”

The extent of the collusion is still unknown and under investigation. NPC spokesman Christensen did not outline the extent of the allegations when asked by USNI News.

In a statement to Navy Times, Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy Steven Giordano confirmed the investigation.

“The E-9 board has been adjourned and an investigation is underway,” he said. “All the members assigned to that board have departed and what we’ll have to do is convene a new board sometime later in the year — when that will be is yet to be determined.”

  • RobM1981

    Regardless of the outcome, and I trust that it will be a fair hearing with a fair outcome, I appreciate the urgency that this was addressed with. This was fast, as it should be.


    I had the privilege of being one of the panel leads for the Senior Chief Board one year. The extent the Navy goes through to make sure that the names of the board members are not leaked out ahead of time and that the boards are as fair and impartial as possible is impressive. I was impressed by the quality of the members and the dedication of everyone I worked with. I would not have wanted to do it again but it was inspiring. Hopefully nothing will be found, but if they find something, hopefully the advancement possibility for some of the ratings (or officer community if it was one of the officers) will improve on the next board. I can’t imagine the number of man hours lost because someone didn’t take their oath seriously.