Home » Aviation » Temporary Fix Identified for T-45C Trainer Oxygen System Failures; Students Still Can’t Land On Carriers Until Permanent Solution Found


Temporary Fix Identified for T-45C Trainer Oxygen System Failures; Students Still Can’t Land On Carriers Until Permanent Solution Found

40 T-45 Goshawk jets from Chief of Naval Air Training Command sit on Naval Air Station Key West’s Boca Chica Field preparing for their aircraft carrier qualifications on Dec. 6, 2016. The student aviators are flying the T-45s during Field Carrier Landing Practice before they head out to the carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) for their first aircraft carrier landings. US Navy photo.

Navy student pilots will resume some flights in the T-45C Goshawk this week after a 12-day operational pause to determine the cause of recent oxygen-generation system failures, but they will not be allowed to land on aircraft carriers or fly higher-altitude missions until a permanent solution is found.

Commander of Naval Air Forces Vice Adm. Mike Shoemaker ordered an initial three-day operational pause on April 5 after increasing concerns that pilots in the two-seat jet trainer may be at risk of hypoxia due to problems with the On Board Oxygen Generator System (OBOGS). That pause was extended as engineers struggled to determine the cause of the OBOGS failure, which Naval Air Forces spokeswoman Cmdr. Jeannie Groeneveld told USNI News is unrelated to the OBOGS failures and other physiological episodes (PEs) experienced in the rest of the Navy’s jet fleet.

Groeneveld said that about 75 percent of the PEs that occur in the F/A-18A-D Hornets, F/A-18E-F Super Hornets and EA-18G Growlers have to do with cabin pressure problems from the Environmental Control System (ECS), and the remaining 25 percent are due to OBOGS. Two key factors with F-18 OBOGS failures have helped the Navy continue operating those aircraft, though: first, she said, the OBOGS system on the F-18s has consistently lit up an indicator light to tell pilots there is an issue before they start to feel sick, allowing the pilot to grab an “O-ring” bottle of pure oxygen to breathe from, which gives about 10 minutes to find a safe place to land. And secondly, once the pilots begin breathing from the O-ring, any symptoms of hypoxia – headache, tingly fingers, grogginess – have subsided.

With the T-45C, Groeneveld said “in every case in the T-45 we weren’t always getting an indicator light” from the OBOGS – which is not identical to the OBOGS found on the other jets. Additionally, if pilots began feeling sick and grabbed the bottled oxygen, their symptoms did not immediately subside.

Engineers have still not determined what the problem is, she said, though three T-45s involved in recent PEs are currently at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md., to be studied. One is having its OBOGS completely disassembled to look for clues, and the other two are undergoing a process similar to a mishap investigation.

Until the engineers discover what is wrong and learn how to fix it, T-45 instructor and student pilots will not be using OBOGS during flights. A modified mask completely detaches them from the system and allows them to get back in the air for about 75 percent of their mission set, though Groeneveld said they could not land on aircraft carriers or exceed 10,000 feet cabin pressure without OBOGS.

“This is a temporary mitigation measure to get them back to some of their flights,” she said.

Operational Pause Timeline

On March 31, “94 flights were canceled between Naval Air Stations Kingsville, Meridian and Pensacola due to operational risk management (ORM) concerns raised by T-45C instructor pilots. Their concerns are over recent physiological episodes experienced in the cockpit that was caused by contamination of the aircraft’s Onboard Oxygen Generation System (OBOGS). Chief of Naval Air Training (CNATRA) immediately requested the engineering experts at NAVAIR conduct in-person briefs with the pilots,” according to an April 5 Navy news release. Those briefings took place on April 3 and 4 ahead of the April 5 operational pause announcement.

Shoemaker visited the three locations on April 6 to 8 to meet with instructor and student pilots, hear their concerns and share with them the Navy’s latest efforts to address the physiological episodes problem, which has been increasing across the Navy’s jet fleet since at least 2010.

“After briefings and discussions with our aircrew, their training wing leadership, the engineers, and aeromedical experts, we have identified a way forward to resume flight operations safely by limiting the maximum cabin altitude to below 10,000 feet in order be able to operate without using the OBOGS system,” Shoemaker said in a Navy statement announcing the end of the operational pause.
“We will be able to complete 75 percent of the syllabus flights with the modified masks while we continue the important engineering testing and analysis at PAX River [Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland] to identify the root cause of the problem. This will remain our top safety priority until we fully understand all causal factors and have identified a solution that will further reduce the risks to our aircrew.”

Beginning this week, instructor pilots will conduct warmup flights with the new masks and operating limits, after which they will brief the remaining pilots and students in their squadrons on the changes. As instructor pilots complete their warmups, warmups and training flights for student pilots will begin.

“We have energized the force, are working with outside agencies, and established an Integrated Project Team (IPT) at NAVAIR, along with an aeromedical crisis action team of flight surgeons, physiologists and toxicologists. All teams are immersed in this effort and working with the same sense of urgency to solve our physiological episodes across the fleet,” Shoemaker said in the April 15 statement.

A T-45C Goshawk training aircraft assigned to Carrier Training Wing (CTW) 2 makes an arrested landing aboard the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) on Feb. 11, 2017. US Navy photo.

Physiological Episodes History

The Navy created a Physiological Episode Team (PET) in 2010 to look into what was then a rising trend in the F/A-18A-D Hornets and the F/A-18E-F Super Hornets, which has since spread to the EA-18G Growler and T-45C Goshawk fleets as well. During these PEs, pilots either receive insufficient oxygen or contaminated oxygen – leading to hypoxia – or experience a drop in cabin pressure, leading to decompression sickness.

“Physiological Episodes (PEs) occur when aircrew experience a decrement in performance, related to disturbances in tissue oxygenation, depressurization or other factors present in the flight environment,” according to recent Navy testimony to the House Armed Services tactical air and land forces subcommittee.
“PEs are categorized into two general groups, those related to Onboard Oxygen Generation Systems (OBOGS) or pilot breathing gas, and those caused by problems in the Environmental Control Systems (ECS), i.e. – unscheduled pressure changes in the flight station. These phenomena jeopardize safe flight.”

Shoemaker and others in the service have called finding a solution to the rising PE numbers a top priority for years and promised a “unconstrained resources” approach – offering whatever money or people were needed to find a solution. But the Navy’s testimony and other recent comments note the complexity in finding a root cause and a solution.

“The NAVAIR PET is currently addressing hypoxia and decompression events as the two most likely causes of recent physiological episodes in aviators. As symptoms related to depressurization, tissue hypoxia and contaminant intoxication overlap, discerning a root cause is a complex process. Episodes of decompression sickness typically accompany a noticeable loss of cabin pressure by the aircrew, while the cause of hypoxic related events may not readily apparent during flight. Reconstruction of the flight event is difficult with potential causal factors not always readily apparent during post-flight debrief and examination.”

Despite increased data collection since 2010, the Navy still doesn’t know what is causing these physiological events – but they are occurring at a growing rate.

For legacy Hornets, PEs occurred at a rate of 3.66 per 100,000 flight hours during Fiscal Year 2006, according to historical flight data, as the Navy hadn’t started collecting PE data yet. In November 2010 through October 2011, that jumped to 10.9 PEs per 100,000 flight hours, and from November 2015 to October 2016, the Navy’s most recent data, pilots experienced 57.24 PEs per 100,000 flight hours.

Similarly, on the Super Hornets, pilots saw 2.18 events per 100,000 hours in FY 2006, 8.65 from fall 2010 to fall 2011, and 31.05 from fall 2015 to fall 2016. On the Growlers, there were zero events until the fall of 2010; from the fall of 2010 until the fall of 2011 Growler pilots saw 5.52 events per 100,000 flight hours, and from the fall of 2015 to fall 2016 that figure spiked to 90.83 events per 100,000 hours.

On the T-45C, data collection only began in 2012 but has increased from 11.86 events per 100,000 flight hours in calendar year 2012 to 46.97 events in 2016.

Aviation Structural Mechanic 3rd Class Jeffery Hendricks removes a screw from an Onboard Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS) while performing special maintenance in the airframes shop aboard the Nimitz-Class nuclear powered aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) on Jan. 5, 2008. US Navy photo.

“The process for investigating a physiological episode begins with the submission of data describing the event. Engineers from the ECS FST and the Aircrew Oxygen Systems In-Service Support Center work with the squadron maintenance department to identify which components of the aircraft should be removed and submitted for engineering investigation. The squadron flight surgeon also submits data on the medical condition of the pilot and in-flight symptoms that were experienced,” according to the Navy’s recent testimony.
“After completion of the component investigations, the incident is examined holistically by members of the engineering teams and Aeromedical specialists to identify the most likely cause of the incident. Of 382 cases adjudicated by the PET so far, 130 have involved some form of contamination, 114 involved an ECS component failure, 91 involved human factors, 50 involved an OBOGS component failure, 13 involved a breathing gas delivery component failure, and 76 were inconclusive or involved another aircraft system failure. Of note, some of the events resulted in assignment to more than one category.”

The new modified mask and modified operational envelop for the T-45C pilots are the latest in a string of ideas to mitigate the risk to pilots, short of an actual solution.

“Though the number of components and configurations of the aircraft make finding ‘smoking guns’ difficult, Naval Aviation has continued to implement multiple lines of effort across over the past couple years to mitigate the risks,” according to the April 8 news release.
“Naval Aviation requires pilots train in the simulator using a Reduced Oxygen Breathing Device to improve aircrew recognition of physiological symptoms related to hypoxia. The improved On Board Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS) [sieve, or filter] material has been installed in all T-45, and new oxygen monitors are being fielded as part of an operational test in Pensacola. Sorbent tubes, devices that detect contaminants in breathing gas air, are also are being provided to pilots and, as soon as our inventory supports, will be required on every flight to help ensure we capture any PE event that might yield clues to the contamination agent.”

The new sieve material will be installed on all OBOGS systems in all jets by the end of the calendar year, with the T-45 fleet already having completed the installation of the new material.

The Navy has also increased the intervals of inspections to improve the rate of detecting component failures before they lead to health hazards for pilots, and it has bought cockpit pressurization warning systems to field in the planes.

“Our aviators must be able to operate with confidence in our platforms and in their ability to safely execute their mission. To help ensure we eliminate this risk, collection and reporting of event data and your continued leadership is critical,” Shoemaker said in the Navy statement.

Pilots perform pre-flight procedures in T-45C Goshawks from Training Air Wing One (TRAWING) 1 on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) on Dec. 10, 2016. US Navy photo.

Shoemaker himself has issued three memos on PEs during his time as Air Boss – one in October 2015, one in May 2016 and one in January 2017. In the most recent memo, he said of future mitigation efforts, “until we fully understand contamination, our goal (partnering with ONR and academia) is the development of a small, lightweight physiological monitor that will detect degraded performance and provide immediate warning to the aircrew, but we are still a few years from that solution.”

“We are working diligently to determine all the root causes of PEs and find solutions, and we will continue to aggressively prioritize resources and engineering efforts. Alert aircrew remains our best line of defense against PEs. Your awareness and immediate actions at the first signs of something ‘not quite right’ are critical, leading to safe aircraft recoveries and the identification of key causal factors. Please continue your focused simulator training, review of PE immediate action items at every brief, and maintenance efforts to identify ECS and OBOGS systems that are not performing to standard,” he continued in the memo.
“You have my word that we will continue to focus all of our [Naval Aviation Enterprise] efforts on this problem, and until we have completely eliminated the PE risks across the force, this will remain our #1 safety priority.”

  • vincedc

    In a couple of weeks, they won’t have any money to fly anyway.

    • oh yes they will….and money to fix all this crap…

  • CharleyA

    It’s a shame that instructor pilots had to initiate a “work stoppage” to get leadership to pay attention. The Navy needs to get to the bottom of this issue, whether it be a design flaw or a mx procedure improperly done (or not done at all.) OBOGS is on most (if not all) US tactical aircraft.

    • its on ALL!!!…..there is NO more LOX!!!!

      • Curtis Conway

        They have the 10 minute bottle.

        • Oskar

          On their ejection seat….

        • Ike_Kiefer

          Seat bottle holds compressed O2, not liquid O2. Navy decomissioned the LOX plants it had at the air stations that made breathing gas for the aircrew and nitrogen for the tires. Just like terminating the helos it used to maintain for downed pilot rescue. Have to put all the O&M money into procurement of the F-35 and other mismanaged acquisition programs.

          • Curtis Conway

            One manages money and material. Leadership is by example, provides resources and removes obstacles so the team can win. The US Navy Leads. The USAF manages.

  • Joey Cool

    So i guess there not coming to NAF El Centro anytime soon

  • OBOGS…..has been a problem for a LONG time , I have been involved with F22 OBOGS issues at Honeywell and witnessed MANY functional tests up to 50000 ft….they always pass in the test cell…but then its hard to pull 9g’s and blank the engine intakes at 50000 ft in the test cell..IMO…….REDESIGN and add 2 or 3 layers of safety, with many more sensors and filters…..NEVER had a problem with a LOX system…lets get OBOGS up to that level.

  • Robert Rubel

    Back in 1991 as CO of a Hornet squadron I had to limit my aircraft to 10,000 feet for several months due to issues with the OBOGS monitor. A few years later one of my best Jo’s was killed in a crash in which hypoxia may have played a role. Amazing that this is cropping up again.

  • vincedc

    These planes have been operational for 25 years. Why is it becoming a problem now?

    • b2

      Near as I can figure, OBOGs (system w/issues) is a fairly recent retrofit from the reliable, safe but expensive logistically, LOX system.
      This is a significant safety issue for all TACAIR OBOGS users not just TRACOM jets. The only difference between the training command T-45s, and T-6s and the fleet Hornets all types that use OBOGs, is that the TRACOM aircraft have contract O-level maintenance. I am sure that will come up, and probably unfairly, as they seek someone/thing to pin the blame on.. This story ain’t over.

  • Gary Himert

    I’m always wondering why I see Navy technicians using tools like vice grips on a precision designed system like OBOGS. When I was in the Fleet as a Marine Avionics guy, my shop chiefs would go bezerk if we used a “one size that fits nothing” tool like vice grips, especially on parts and assemblies made of aluminum. Plus the potential for chrome plating to come off the tools and cause FOD issues or contamination as well.

    • Ike_Kiefer

      Had the same thought, and multiple vice grips and a mallet in the photo. Precision Navy maintenance.

    • Oskar

      So, you know EXACTLY what is happening in the photo?

      You see the tech. using the vice grips?

      Couldn’t be posed for a photo, you think?

  • Curtis Conway

    Good article. Fairly comprehensive and very informative. I hope the USAF is monitoring as well. this OBOGS problem has got to be solved once and for all. It’s as if Safety Margin just isn’t in this equation, and everything is right on the line of functionality.

  • Curtis Conway

    “The improved On Board Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS) [sieve, or filter] material has been installed in all T-45…”

    “Of 382 cases adjudicated by the PET so far, 130 have involved some form of contamination…”

    Since the molecular sieves (filters) work on a ‘molecular’ level, one wonders if contaminants in the air are the cause of some failures. Anyone been spraying compounds in the atmosphere lately, particularly elements that are usually NOT in the atmosphere in concentration, at higher altitudes? If someone has, then perhaps this is a ‘Canary in the Coal Mine’ event. Tip of the iceberg on fuel additives, perhaps?

  • Scott Cordier

    go back to LOX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Oskar

      THAT easy, is it?

  • Ed L

    Always prefer the BAE version in the attack aircraft mode

  • Gen. Buck Turgidson

    Stand firm pilots,,the fix sounds as bad as the problem

  • George Hollingsworth

    Well, on Monday, May 22, over one month will have elapsed since the 30 day review was commanded by the Admiral. And the answer is…….?