Home » Aviation » Advanced Arresting Gear Tests Delayed But Little Operational Impact Expected


Advanced Arresting Gear Tests Delayed But Little Operational Impact Expected

F/A-18E Super Hornet lands with the Advanced Arresting Gear at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, in Lakehurst, New Jersey, on March 31, 2016. US Navy Photo

F/A-18E Super Hornet lands with the Advanced Arresting Gear at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, in Lakehurst, New Jersey, on March 31, 2016. US Navy Photo

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – The Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) test schedule for aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) was pushed back again, but the delay may cause little impact thanks to a slew of post-delivery test requirements for the first-in-class ship, the CVN-78 class program manager told USNI News.

Manned aircraft just began arrested landings on a ground-based AAG runway system in New Jersey on March 31, Capt. Chris Meyer said Monday at the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space Exposition 2016, and the first manned airplanes will not be cleared to land on Ford until November. Program officials last fall said the manned aircraft landings in New Jersey were set to begin in February, with the first ship landings cleared by this summer.

Due to a design problem in General Atomics-built AAG discovered three years ago, the system faced about a two-year delay and, whereas the rest of Ford is 98 percent complete, AAG is still being installed on the ship. The Navy intended to install the improved AAG on the ship and conduct land-based tests at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, N.J., concurrently to help buy back lost time. Though the delays with AAG continue, Meyer said it was possible that the new pushed-back schedule would have no operational impact.

On the hull side, Ford is set for builder’s trials and acceptance trials in August, where the ship’s propulsion, mechanical, electrical and combat systems will be tested but not flight deck operations. The carrier is set for a late-September delivery – compared to the previous March 2016 delivery date – pending the results of the sea trials, Meyer told USNI News after his presentation. Once the ship delivers to the Navy, six-month shakedown period will begin.

An artist's conception of an installed Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) on a U.S. carrier. General Atomics Image

An artist’s conception of an installed Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) on a U.S. carrier. General Atomics Image

“It’s important to remember that we’re not going to start on day 1 on the ship launching and recovering fleet aircraft,” he said of the ship shakedown. Because the island on the flight deck is shaped and located differently than is the island on Nimitz-class carriers, the Navy still needs to understand how that will shape the wind patterns for flight deck operations. The very first at-sea period for the ship after its delivery will support rotary wing dynamic interface testing, Meyer said. The carrier will then conduct air traffic control certifications with its new radar systems, and will eventually bring out test squadrons to conduct the first manned launches on the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) and manned arrested landings on the ship with AAG.

Meanwhile, manned AAG testing in New Jersey will continue, with the Navy testing F/A-18E-F Super Hornets first. By November the engineers will issue an Aircraft Recovery Bulletin for the Super Hornets, allowing them to begin landing on the aircraft carrier.

“So by the time we’re ready to do fleet aircraft, all of this will have sorted itself out,” Meyer said, noting that a November start to Super Hornet flight deck operations will work fine given the rest of the post-delivery events.

The engineers in New Jersey will then test the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye and eventually the legacy F/A-18C-D Hornets.

“I’m pretty confident two of those are going to finish before shakedown is done,” Meyer told USNI News.
“The very last one, F-18C-D, there’s some risk that might bump out a little bit. We’ll just have to keep watching it, but pretty close.”

Program Executive Officer for Aircraft Carriers Rear Adm. Tom Moore said in October that having only one type of airplane to work with during the shakedown would be okay because “the catapults and arresting gear are agnostic to what type of planes land on them. … It doesn’t matter to me how many different type/model/series, I just need planes for launching and recovering during the six-month period between delivery and before I take it in for the post-shakedown availability.”

Still, Meyer said he hoped to receive Aircraft Recovery Bulletins for the two remaining aircraft types before the end of shakedown so as not to affect crew training.

“You want the ship to be able to train with the full air wing, so if that recovery bulletin is not done then that’s one plane in the air wing that you couldn’t train with on Day 1,” Meyer told USNI News.
“But it’s a two-year (training) period, so if it’s Day 2 that’s not necessarily the worst thing.”

Once delivered, put through shakedown and a post-shakedown availability and then commissioned, the ship’s crew will have two years to train ahead of a summer 2019 full ship shock trial.

Despite ongoing AAG challenges, Meyer said the rest of the ship was coming together nicely. The ship is 98 percent complete, with 88 percent of hull, mechanical and electrical (HM&E) testing complete and 78 percent of electronics testing complete. The remaining testing is “on track to finish up this summer” ahead of sea trials, Meyer said in his presentation. The carrier’s Multi-Function Radar has done high-power radiation from all three of its faces and handed off targets amongst those array faces. The Volume Search Radar just achieved high-power radiation on its third face this week.

Though AAG testing is running behind schedule and the data set is limited, Meyer said test data on EMALS has shown the system to be more reliable than predicted.

  • Donald Carey

    Just how would using a steam catapult fix problems with arresting gear? Inquiring minds want to know.

    In any case, the years required to get the next carrier completed to the point where catapults and arresting gear can be installed will give plenty of time to get testing done.

    • Secundius

      It’s a Stop-Gap Fix to the Problem, until General Atomics can Work the Bug Out f the System. As Newer FORD’s become available. Older FORD’s can be Refitted during Scheduled Maintenance REFIT Cycles as they come. CNV-79, JFK is expected to make her debut in 2018 and CVN-89, Enterprise in 2023. That’s 2-years Minimum and 7-years Maximum to WORK the Bug’s- Out. If THEY (General Atomics) CAN’T Work the Bugs-Out in 7-years, WERE (the US Navy) are going to Have THREE 110,000-ton Paperweights on their hands…

      • Donald Carey

        You missed my point – you recommended using a STEAM CATAPULT as a stop-gap for delayed ARRESTING GEAR – just how does that work?

        Again, inquiring minds want to know!

        • Secundius

          They Have TWO Years to Work the Bug’s Out BEFORE “JFK” is Launched. If NOT FIXED by Then. Go Bach to ALL STEAM, Including Arresting Gear. World First, TWO Nuclear-Powered Gator-Freighters of 110,000-tons each…

          • Donald Carey

            Current arresting gear systems are hydraulic, not steam (I guess looking that up for yourself was too complicated or time-consuming).

            b.t.w. – Bach was a composer during the Baroque period. (To get back to basic English vocabulary.)

          • Secundius

            Can the Electromagnetic Arresting Gear, Work Independently of the EMALS? If so Replace the EMALS, until such date as a Fully-Functional EMAL can be Retrofitted Back Into the Original Design Plan.

            Depends on WHAT you call “Basic English”. In BACH’s Time it was Known as New English (1560 to 1840). Modern English DIDN’T Exist Before 1826…

          • Donald Carey

            Please stop responding to my replies until you educate yourself about how arresting gear currently in use in the U.S. Navy works – you are embarrassing yourself. EMAL is not an arresting system – the new system is called the AAG (as a casual review of this article shows).

            The word back had the same meaning in 1560 as it does today, again, I am embarrassed for you.

            b.t.w. – You could also review the use of capitalization in modern English…

          • Secundius

            Actually IT DOESN’T! New and Modern English Have Different Syntax, One reason the NRA can’t Wrap There Collective Heads Around the 2nd Amendment Issue. I Capitalize to Point Out or Clarify a Statement. Either Deal with it or Ignore it…

          • Donald Carey

            Syntax changes do not change the meaning of the word back as I used it.

            It is said that it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. Your reply, and your statement about the NRA proves that.

            It is also said that one should not feed trolls, so I’ll not respond to any more of your posts. Have a nice life.

          • Secundius

            Does it? Dictionary used the define words in the 2nd Amendment was published in England in 1690. Try use that Dictionary, and NOT a Modern dictionary and see what you come up with…