Home » Aviation » Navy: Half the Carrier Fleet Tied Up In Maintenance, Other 5 Strained To Meet Demands

Navy: Half the Carrier Fleet Tied Up In Maintenance, Other 5 Strained To Meet Demands

The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) arrives pierside at Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton prior to a planned incremental availability at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility. US Navy photo.

The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) arrives pierside at Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton prior to a planned incremental availability at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility. US Navy photo.

The Navy has run its 10 aircraft carriers hard since USS Enterprise (CVN-65) decommissioned in December 2012 and is now paying the resulting maintenance bill, with half the fleet tied up in repairs and the other five trying to keep up with combatant commanders’ needs.

During a House Armed Services Committee hearing on aircraft carrier presence, Program Executive Officer for Aircraft Carriers Rear Adm. Tom Moore said that five of the 10 carriers are unavailable for tasking due to maintenance work.

USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) is in the middle of its Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) at Newport News Shipbuilding, and USS George Washington (CVN-73) is making a slow, engagement-filled voyage from its previous homeport in Japan to Newport News Shipbuilding, where it will await the start of its RCOH in 2017. USS Nimitz (CVN-68) is in a 14-month availability at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Washington, USS George H.W. Bush (CVN-77) is in an eight-month availability at Norfolk Naval Shipyard, and USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) is in a six-month availability in San Diego, Moore said.

“I think what we’ve seen here recently, as a result of being down to 10 carriers and having to run carriers at a pace faster than they were designed for – for instance, Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) just finished a 24-month availability, which was only scheduled for 14 months; she had deployed four times since 2008 with only one maintenance availability in there. So much faster than we had designed, consumed the service life of that ship much faster, so it’s really no surprise that you saw some of the impacts there.

“We’ve got to get our arms around that, I’ve certainly spend a lot of time looking at Eisenhower to figure out where we can do better going into maintenance periods,” Moore said.

Moore said during the hearing that the operational tempo for the carrier fleet has gotten higher since Enterprise decommissioned but that not all carriers have been used equally in the last three years. Nimitz and Eisenhower in particular have been pushed hard, and it shows in the maintenance periods. Ike’s 14-month maintenance availability had to be extended by nearly a year, forcing USS Harry S Truman (CVN-75) to take on an unscheduled deployment this fall with only a reduced maintenance availability after its last deployment – which may hurt Truman down the road.

And Nimitz will spend the better part of three years in maintenance to make up for work that has been skipped previously to allow for greater overseas presence, Moore said.

“We really run her at a higher optempo than some of the other carriers, so of the availabilities we have going on right now I would tell you that the Nimitz one up in Bremerton is the most challenging in terms of the size of the work package,” he said. To compensate, rather than send Nimitz straight into its regularly scheduled docked availability, the Navy inserted a 14-month “extended maintenance availability” to be followed by the docked period, “so she’s going to have, in the span of three years, a significant amount of maintenance done on her to try to catch back up.”

Even if Nimitz and Eisenhower took the worst of the combined carrier shortfall and uptick in combatant commander demand since 2012, the other ships have been pushed hard too.

“In the last three years in order to meet the demand signal from the COCOMS … we’ve run the carriers harder than we’ve typically done and harder than they were designed,” Moore said.
“We’ve had, since 2012, seven aircraft carriers that have gone more than 300 days deployed time between maintenance availabilities – not all consecutive (deployed days), but that’s an awful lot of run time, and that’s a challenge we’re going to have to continue to face here until we get” USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), which will commission next year but not be operationally available until 2021 due to first-in-class test and evaluation.

The Navy is transitioning into its new deployment schedule, the Optimized Fleet Response Plan, which would limit deployments to seven months and ensure proper maintenance and training time for the ships, crews and air wings. However, given that only five carriers are currently available for tasking, HASC seapower ranking member Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.) asked if the Navy could realistically stick to its plan.

“You’re going to be showered in demands, and it’s going to take discipline to sort of maintain this for the next three years or so,” he said to the four Navy officials testifying at the hearing.
“Do you all feel confident we’re going to be able to get through this patch and accomplish the goals of a fleet that is ready to meet all the requirements that are out there?”

Vice Adm. John Aquilino, vice chief of naval operations for operations, plans and strategy, responded that “we’re confident that our model and our plans will get us where we need to be, absent the fact that the world gets a vote.”

Already the Navy has chosen to accept gaps in carrier presence around the world to deal with the current condition of the carrier fleet. There is no aircraft carrier in the Middle East presently, though Truman will deploy later this year to U.S. 5th Fleet. Aquilino said the Navy would risk having carrier gaps in the Middle East or Pacific, where there had previously been at least one or two carrier strike groups in each theater at all times, until 2021.

Navy acquisition chief Sean Stackley added that “we’re operating a small number of carriers, low-density, high-demand, and if the temperature rises in a risk area around the world, then senior leadership is going to have to decide is it more important to do that maintenance, which is a long-term investment, or do we have to respond today to the immediate crisis.”

He said that returning to an 11-carrier force in 2021 will help create a more sustainable schedule for maintenance and deployments, but being down a carrier now means driving the other 10 ships harder, which puts more ships in maintenance than planned, which forces even fewer ships to work even harder to meet global requirements.

Moore told USNI News after the hearing that he learned a lot of lessons from the Eisenhower maintenance availability, after back-to-back deployments without maintenance and four total deployments in seven years. He will apply those lessons to Truman when that carrier returns from what is essentially a back-to-back deployment, with just a couple months maintenance for only the most necessary work rather than a full planned maintenance availability.

Moore noted than Truman might not come back in as bad a condition as Eisenhower did after the double deployment, given than Truman is only 18 years old compared to the 38-year-old Ike.

“So a little bit younger ship, so it has the ability to kind of absorb a little bit more than say Eisenhower did,” Moore said.

Still, “we made a conscious decision to shorten the maintenance period, we don’t like to do that but we’ll keep a very close eye on that when she comes back for her next availability.”

  • Secundius

    I got an Idea? Tell the CEO’s and Board of Director’s of the Newport News Shipyard’s, that If they want to STAY OUT OF PRISON, ALL SHIP REPAIR’s are covered under their GUARANTEED LIFETIME WARRANTY…

    • sferrin

      Stupidest idea I’ve seen on here yet. (And that’s saying something.) Take your car that’s got 180,000 miles on it down to the shop and tell them they need to fix it on their dime or they’re going to jail. They’ll laugh you out of the shop. Same thing. Agreements are made, up front, as to what is or isn’t “guaranteed”. I believe it’s called a “warranty” or “contract”. If the USN was stupid enough to try your stunt companies would just stop building ships for them and go out of business. They’d be driven out of business anyway under your brilliant “plan”.

      • Michael Rich

        @michael_flower:disqus isn’t exactly known for being that bright.

    • mike46

      Most of that time in RCOH is not ‘repairs’. It is upgrading and updating systems with new technology.
      Where did you ever get the mindless idea that they gave a LIFETIME WARRANTY? The Nave doesn’t specify what a lifetime is.

  • Bush+Obama=Satans love child

    None of this makes sense. Why does it take 6 years (2190 days) to test Ford? Why does it take 3 years (1095 days) to repair a carrier? They are wearing the other carriers out trying to meet the demands of a Navy that requires 7 operational carriers to fulfill missions placed on them. This seems to me to be a cost savings operation to pay for Ford class, Ohio replacement, Littorals, & F-35 acquisition costs. How you leave the Middle East without a carrier in times like these is completely insane. Mabus & Obama make me sick.

    • Michael Rich

      To be honest, the ‘carrier gap’ isn’t that big of deal. We have enough land based aircraft to make up for it until we get a new one in there. The carrier is good for time sensitive operations before we get the “go” from our allies to use their airbases.

      Although I do agree that 10 is not enough, cutting back was a mistake.

      • publius_maximus_III

        And our NATO “ally” Turkey has been VERY cooperative thus far, right?

  • sferrin

    Wow, nobody saw this coming when they decided to cut back to 10 carriers. *FACE PALM*

    • Fred Stanley

      This goes back decades. The America was retired after 30 years. The JFK was basically driven into the ground so she had to be retired.
      Both ships could still be active and helping to fill the gap but the navy was chomping at the bit to have an all nuclear carrier fleet.
      The navy seemed to think they could just ask congress to jack it back up to 11 or 12 at any time. The navy played a part in reducing the fleet and now they’re reaping what they sowed.

  • Matt

    We need more carriers, they need to be cheap, UAVs are cheap, BUILD A FRIGGIN FLEET OF UAV CARRIERS based on a commercial hull like the MLP, also cheap. It’s called “INNOVATE” “ADAPT” “OVERCOME”. I know… too simple. How many years does a cruise ship sit at the pier in its life? I am aware of the need to continually modernize the most advanced warship mankind owns but there could be a more efficient and more lethal solution. And a good high/low mix works well too.

  • disqus_zommBwspv9

    Time for SAG’s to become the Forlorn hope for the Navy. I always though 12 CV’s was the low number due to the deployment tempo. Or The Navy can build 120 Burkes and sent them in Harms way in groups of 6, with an SSN too.. Add a Tico cruiser too. That’s 500+ Missiles, Maybe the Marines know that a Forlorn Hope is?

    Or we need to build some islands of our own

    • sferrin

      Useless. A 6 Burkes don’t have the capability of a carrier. This shouldn’t need to be said.

    • publius_maximus_III

      Love the DDG’s, especially packs of them.

  • publius_maximus_III

    In private industry, everybody tries to reduce their inventory costs. A ship out of service for whatever reason is the same thing as inventory. It’s a huge chunk of change, tied up, and not being “productive” while the meter is running. JMO

  • gunnerv1

    By “Official” Proclamation, (by this Article) we have just realized we’re now a “Second Rate” Navy. Japan, China, Russia, and India are building Carriers (some classed as “Super” Carrier status) Who’s about to outclass us next, The Netherlands or Canada?

  • John B. Morgen

    Our Fleet needs to have a composite force of aircraft carriers, or a mixture of CVB(N)s, and CVs of (medium tonnage of 60,000 tons). More CVs, the better to filled in the gaps when CVB(N)s are not available for service. Or two/three CVs should be require per one CVB(N) be built in order for resolving this aircraft carrier shortage problem.

  • Fred Stanley

    The Navy has no one to blame but themselves for this issue. They couldn’t be content with having Nimitz class carriers, or even return to an updated Kitty Hawk design, which are 3 generations ahead of anything else afloat and which could be built on a 4-5 year cycle.
    The Navy HAD to have the Ford carriers and they HAD to jam every new and unproven technology into it because they had to be FOUR generations ahead.
    As a result you have a carrier more than twice as expensive as a Nimitz and which will take at LEAST 12 years from laying down to being ready for active duty!!!!!!!!

    To put it in perspective the Enterprise CVN-65 was laid down in 1958 and about 3.5 years later was on station off Cuba as part of the blockade. And the Enterprise was the FIRST nuclear powered carrier and had several new technologies like SCANFAR. So it would be expected she would take significantly longer to build and work up to operational status than the preceding Kitty Hawk class. But there was almost no difference in the amount of time needed to complete the Enterprise.

    I’m a Navy guy but they, more than any other service, has mostly refused to adapt to the times and look at alternatives besides just building the most sophisticated platforms available. Seawolf, Virginia, Zumwalt, Ford…. all amazing ships….all slow and expensive to build. And I don’t care how good the Ford class is, it can’t be in 4 places at once. Yet the Navy can’t seem to grasp this obvious math and is always needing more hulls in the water.

    Even the big attempt at a cheaper and more flexible, the LCS, had ended up being an expensive ship whose value is dubious so far.

  • Pingback: Driving Aircraft Carrier | teacher - driving instructor()

  • Pingback: Report: Navy and Marine Corps Strained to Breaking Point; Second Forward Carrier in the Pacific Could Help | Aircrew Systems()

  • Pingback: Report: Navy and Marine Corps Strained to Breaking Point; Second Forward Carrier in the Pacific Could Help - Association of Naval Aviation in Virginia Beach, Virginia - Hampton Roads Squadron()

  • Pingback: USS Nimitz to Remain in Bremerton Until 2019 to Avoid Homeport Changes Between Maintenance Periods | Aircrew Systems()