Home » Aviation » Pentagon: China Developing New Anti-Satellite Weapons, Jammers


Pentagon: China Developing New Anti-Satellite Weapons, Jammers

Shenzhou-9 spacecraft in 2012.

Shenzhou-9 spacecraft in 2012.

China is designing weapons to counter advanced Western satellite technology using directed energy weapons and jammers and may have already tested some, according to a Friday Chinese military assessment to Congress.

The West — particularly the U.S. — relies on ever expanding constellations of communications and surveillance satellites to maintain its information edge over potential rivals and China is seeking ways to erode that advantage in the event of a conflict, according to the Military and Security Developments
Involving the People’s Republic of China 2015 report to Congress.

“China continues to develop a variety of capabilities designed to limit or prevent the use of space- based assets by adversaries during a crisis or conflict, including the development of directed-energy weapons and satellite jammers,” read the report.

Dubbed counterspace, the efforts follow several demonstrations of China’s capabilities to interdict satellites with ground-based missiles in the last several years.

Perhaps the most well known is Jan. 11, 2007 test in which a modified Chinese ballistic missile successfully destroyed a defunct weather satellite in polar orbit — littering Earth’s orbit with debris and surprising the West.

Since then, the Pentagon report has cited several instances in which it appears the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has conducted similar — albeit non-destructive — tests.

A July 2014 missile test “did not result in the destruction of a satellite or space debris, read the report.
”However, due to the evidence suggesting that this was a follow-up to the 2007 destructive test, the United States expressed concern that China’s continued development of destructive space technologies represented a threat to all peaceful space-faring nations, and was inconsistent with China’s public statements about the use of space for peaceful purposes.”
Additionally, in 2013 a suspicious Chinese launch sent an object into an orbital neighborhood crowded with geosynchronous communications satellites.

“Analysis of the launch determined that the booster was not on the appropriate trajectory to place objects in orbit and that no new satellites were released,” read the report.

After a little more than nine hours, the mystery object landed, leaving the rest of the space faring world puzzled to what the object was.

“The United States and several public organizations expressed concern to Chinese representatives and asked for more information about the purpose and nature of the launch. China thus far has refrained from providing additional information,” read the report.

The report feared the test could “have been a test of technologies with a counterspace mission in geosynchronous orbit.”

The U.S. relies heavily on satellites for communications and some targeting of its weapons a fact that has not been lost on the PLA.

“PLA writings emphasize the necessity of ‘destroying, damaging, and interfering with the enemy’s reconnaissance … and communications satellites,’ suggesting that such systems, as well as navigation and early warning satellites, could be among the targets of attacks designed to ‘blind and deafen the enemy’,” read the report.
“PLA analysis of U.S. and coalition military operations also states that ‘destroying or capturing satellites and other sensors … will deprive an opponent of initiative on the battlefield and [make it difficult] for them to bring their precision guided weapons into full play’.”

The report to Congress comes as some in the Air Force have called for a more robust defense of U.S. space assets, according to a Monday analysis from Jane’s Defence Weekly.

“The USAF’s outgoing military acquisition chief recently acknowledged that the Pentagon is devising new concepts for protecting its space assets, hinting at the need for new types of deterrence. ‘We have to put some resources and some focus on protection capability,’ Lt. Gen. Ellen Pawlikowski said in April,” read the Monday report.

 

  • Curtis Conway

    The United States Navy should have an emphasis on Line of Sight and Passive systems for all Surface Vessels, but specifically Surface Combatants. Use of the entire EM Spectrum is required for a true defense in depth against a 21st Century adversary.

  • Leatherstocking

    In a war with a major player like the PRC or Russia, we can expect interference and/or destruction of space assets. C4ISR will be degraded. We haven’t had a technologically advanced adversary in decades. We’ve come to rely heavily on a very soft space architecture which has made degrading those systems a much higher priority for our adversaries.

  • Pingback: Orbital ATK-Built SKY MEXICO-1 Commercial Satellite Successfully Launched … – Business Wire (press release) | mvcsattelites()

  • blah77

    As an American, I find the hypocrisy of this country utterly ridiculous. The US has been developing space warfare capabilities since the 1980’s, well before China became an economic powerhouse. Now that China is trying to catch up in this realm, it is somehow representing a “a threat to all peaceful space-faring nations”. Excuse me but how many wars has the US started or militarily intervened in during the past 30 years. Were all of them legal? How many such conflicts has China been directly involved in? I suspect that America is one of the few nations in the world that actually views itself as “peace living”. Actually, I take back the suspect part because worldwide polls have been conducted on this very topic on numerous occasions and the US came out on top by a wide margin as the “greatest threat to world peace”.

    Every major nation that has underwent the path of economic development has modernized its military as part of that process but now it is China’s turn, it is somehow the exception to the rule? What are they supposed to do? Let their 1960’s and 70’s era military equipment continue to rot as to not damage the sensitivities of the west? Intentionally cripple themselves in order to not be perceived as challenging the global hegemon status of America despite being nearly as large in land mass and more than four times the population? What an idotic line of thought that ignores all principles of self-preservation. Just another example of American Exceptionalism gone wild.