Home » Budget Industry » Hunt: LCS Council Has Had ‘Positive Impact’

Hunt: LCS Council Has Had ‘Positive Impact’

The littoral combat ship USS Freedom (LCS 1) departs San Diego harbor to conduct operations off the coast of Southern California in October. US Navy Photo

The littoral combat ship USS Freedom (LCS 1) departs San Diego harbor to conduct operations off the coast of Southern California in October. US Navy Photo

The Director of U.S. Navy Staff is recommending to service leadership to extend the life of the council of admirals appointed to oversee the development of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, he said in a letter obtained by USNI News on Friday.

The senior level focus on the ships and their accompanying mission packages, “has had positive impact through out the LCS program . . . I highly recommend the LCS council remain in place to monitor and provide oversight,” wrote LCS council leader Vice Adm. Richard Hunt.

The four-admiral panel was established in August to provide additional oversight to the LCS program following several internal Navy reports that called into question original manning and maintenance assumptions of the ships, Navy officials said at the time.

In the first five months the council has overseen changes to manpower, training, maintenance and concept of operations for the LCS program, Hunt wrote.

Some changes include expanding the core crew of 40 sailors on USS Freedom to 50 for its planned March deployment to Singapore as a test some of the manning assumptions of the ship.

The council also developed a Plan of Action and Milestones (POAM) program for LCS. In addition to the POAM, the council has also identified additional focus on the LCS’ mission modules, seaframe modification based on commonality and reliability reviews and planned review of Freedom’s initial deployment when its returns.

The council, headed by Hunt, includes Vice Adm. Mark Skinner, Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition; Vice Adm. Tom Copeman, commander, Naval Surface Forces; and Vice Adm. Kevin McCoy, commander, Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA).

“Challenges remain for the LCS program,” Hunt wrote. “But there are great opportunities.

Like What You've Been Reading? Get Proceedings Today
Categories: Budget Industry, News & Analysis, Surface Forces, U.S. Navy
Sam LaGrone

About Sam LaGrone

Sam LaGrone is the editor of USNI News. He was formerly the U.S. Maritime Correspondent for the Washington D.C. bureau of Jane’s Defence Weekly and Jane’s Navy International. He has covered legislation, acquisition and operations for the Sea Services and spent time underway with the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps and the Canadian Navy.

  • Taxpayer71

    On 30 January 2013, The Naval War
    College released a working paper titled The Littoral Combat Ship: How We Got Here, and Why, by Robert O.Work. It contains the following statements:

    “Next to program affordability, the next most striking element of the LCS concept was
    the degree to which its ultimate success would rely on the broader forcewide
    transition to the new FORCEnet architecture.”

    “….as FORCEnet’s first small battle network combatant, the ship’s [LCS’} effectiveness
    and survivability would depend on “reach back” to “networked force capability”
    to a degree unseen on any previous U.S. Navy warship.”

    Assuming these statements have merit, it would seem reasonable that the LCS council would address not only the ship but also LCS’ requirements for FORCEnet and reachback performance required for mission success and survivability and progress toward their satisfaction.