Home » Budget Industry » Panel to Congress: China Accelerating Technology Development in Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing

Panel to Congress: China Accelerating Technology Development in Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing

Chinese People Liberation Army cyber troops. PLA Photo

Believing that information dominance is key to global power, China has poured billions into developing artificial intelligence and quantum computing and exploiting the results to its advantage, three experts told a House Armed Services Committee Tuesday.

“In quantum, China may already be ahead,” William Carter, deputy director of the Technology Policy Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said.

“We find ourselves in a new era of competition with China” where Beijing is challenging the United States economically, militarily and politically. It is positioning itself as an innovator in technology, organization and doctrine.

Beijing is dictating developments from the top down in several areas selected by leadership. In the past, most technological advances were viewed as steps forward in only one area.

The renewed focus is allowing China to forge ahead in the largely unexplored area of quantum computing, critical to future cryptography and communications.

Beijing also is still “looking for gaps in our approach” with the idea to “disrupt and degrade our military capabilities.” Carter mentioned their advances in anti-satellite technology, electronic warfare and offensive and defensive cyber as examples of this.

“This whole of society approach,” tying private companies and the government together to achieve dominance is not the only way to succeed said Dean Cheng, of the Heritage Foundation’s Asia Studies Center. He cited the approach President Dwight Eisenhower adopted of letting innovation also rise up from a dynamic private sector that would, “push across new technologies driven by the profit motive” for use by the government.

Members of the Emerging Threats and Capabilities returned often to questions about quantum computing during the hearing.

“Quantum goes beyond cyber” because it can be affecting space capabilities, super-computing, virtual reality, directed energy, artificial intelligence and genomic understanding in human enhancement. That was a theme all agreed on.

All three also pointed out China is innovator as well as a borrower — legally and illegally — and buyer of advanced technologies.

China’s “government is willing to develop and follow-through on long-term investment plans,” something the United States’ government and many American private companies do not, Paul Scharre, director of the National Security Program at the Center for New America Security said. He specifically mentioned genomics and biotechnology as areas where China is making these investments.

Cheng estimated Beijing plans to spend $150 billion on artificial intelligence research and development in the next decade.

It also means investing in human capital. While the United States government invests little in these technologies and private firms view their potential profit-making potential warily so is reluctant to spend in this area, “China is very active in this.” This money attracts post-doctoral researchers in these fields with grants to come to China to work. It is also using its universities to attract these young men and women early.

As Beijing does this, “we do have a lot of barriers” to foreign students coming to the United States, remaining to do research in graduate school and pursue that as a career later here, Cheng said.

Carter added there is also a line of thinking inside the Department of Defense that does not always adequately assess the vulnerability of advanced technologies in the inventory or coming along when it is buying weapons. In part that comes about “because the conflicts we are engaged in today, our space-based assets are not threatened.” He suggests Congress could lead the way in coming up with directors to have analog fallbacks.

Later in answer to a question, he said, “machine-learning systems have their own vulnerabilities” that need to be addressed from the beginning. “Machine-learning systems” are an application of artificial intelligence that can improve their performance based on experience.

Looking at satellite vulnerability, smaller, cheaper, but many times higher numbers for communications –4,000 in a constellation — appears to be a good answer. Cheng said China is pursuing that avenue for itself with sales to “countries new to satellites,” such as Nigeria, Indonesia and Thailand.


  • Cato

    It is interesting to see that today’s story regarding new frigates has generated more than 100 comments, and that this story has generated none.

    Of course getting the frigate right is important, but in terms of our long-term security and primacy, this is where the real action is. Yet the issues are largely ignored. But these challenges by the Chinese (and others) of course involve investment in education, closer coordination with universities and the private sector, and a deep sense of urgency, not good old steel, and thus we risk falling behind.

    • DaSaint

      The new FFG should be the first US warship to include some sort of cyberwarfare center for disruption of enemy systems within a 500 mile radius. This goes beyond electronic warfare, and will make the ship much more effective than just conventional weapons.

  • DaSaint

    This is a Langley moment. A transition if I’ve ever seen one. If information dominance is successful, hardware becomes virtually useless. Unless you can prevent the disruption of those systems, the systems won’t work when you need them to, or will engage illusory targets generated by the enemy.

    Time to take this seriously.

  • kye154

    I know this irks a lot of Americans, but you really can’t help but to admire how far China has come. It has made a lot of significant progress in its military over the past 20 years. It’s military went from having much of nothing to competing with the U.S. and the Russians in a lot of areas. And what is more, China seemed to have done it far cheaper than what the U.S. military is able to do. That is really the big issue of China’s success. DoD bleeds way too much money on things that could be better spent developing AI. This was proven back in 2013 when they ran simulations of battles with the new LCSs class ships and the LCSs lost. The simulator was nothing more than an extension of AI itself, and demonstrated the deficiencies of not only the LCSs themselves, but the weaknesses in U.S. military strategies too, that up until now, DoD has not been able to see. AI can be used in lots of areas, but perhaps DoD should incorporate AI in their acquisition process too, to help design better things and become more efficient, as well as to save money!

    • Donald Carey

      That much of their advance has been by sometimes buying through shady deals (does the name Clinton come to mind?), and outright theft DOES irk me. Their attitude that the end justifies the means reflects on their character – much like many “progressives” in the Western world who share the same attitude, they are not to be trusted, ever.

  • Josh

    Were going to drop the ball on this and china will be the new military superpower

  • Zorcon, Fidei Defensor

    Perhaps this is because the Chinese are not concerned about millions upon millions of regulations, rules and compliance. They are concerned with results? The US used to be that way but especially in the past 9 years, the focus seems to be on compliance with this or that and the objective is some unimportant artifact. In fact, since 9-11, do we even have a focus now?