Home » Budget Industry » Dunford Backs Building 12th San Antonio-Class Warship


Dunford Backs Building 12th San Antonio-Class Warship

By:
Published:
Updated:
Gen. John Dunford in 2012. DoD Photo

Gen. John Dunford in 2012. DoD Photo

Gen. Joseph Dunford, the Pentagon’s pick to lead the Marine Corps, told Congress on Thursday he backs a congressional plan to add a 12th San Antonio-class amphibious warship to the fleet to the planned class of 11.

Dunford made his case for the additional San Antonio-class warship (LPD-17) during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

‘We’re both short of the numbers of the ships required to meet the combatant commanders’ day-to-day requirements as well as to aggregate Marines to conduct an amphibious assault,” Dunford told committee members.
“I believe that that the (LPD-17) will help mitigate the risk,” he added, during an exchange with Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) at Thursday’s hearing.

If confirmed, Dunford will replace outgoing Commandant Gen. James Amos. Army Maj, Gen. John Campbell has been pegged to replace Dunford as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan.

During Thursday’s hearing, Dunford noted a 12-ship LPD-17 fleet would not be the silver bullet in solving the Corps’ concerns on amphibious operations. But the four-star general did say the addition of an additional LPD-17 to the already undermanned amphib fleet could reduce risk in those missions.

USS San Antonio (LPD 17), part of the Kearsarge Amphibious Ready group, underway on June 16, 2013. US Navy Photo

USS San Antonio (LPD 17), part of the Kearsarge Amphibious Ready group, underway on June 16, 2013. US Navy Photo

The additional San Antonio will “not completely close the gap, but it will help mitigate the risk that we have right now in both of those areas,” he said.

When asked, point blank, whether the Corps’ needed a full, 12-ship LPD-17 fleet, Dunford replied: “We do, Senator”

Navy and Marine Corps leaders had initially planned to field a 11-ship LPD-17 fleet, as part of the sea service’s overall future shipbuilding plan sent to Congress in February.

Twenty former U.S. Marine Corps generals, including former commandant Gen. James Conway and former U.S. Central Command commander Gen. James. Mattis,
sent a letter to Congress pressing for a full compliment of 12 San Antonio-class warships.

“The challenges of diminished ship material readiness and the declining numbers of amphibious warships are interrelated and have cumulative effect on the nation’s ability to support strategic imperatives,” according to the letter, reported by USNI News in March.

That said, defense lawmakers in the House and Senate have already funded the 12 ships in their respective versions of the fiscal year 2015 DOD spending legislation. House authorizers fully funded the 12-ship requirement in their draft defense bill, while Senate appropriators followed suit in their bill, voted out of the defense subcommittee on Tuesday.

  • 2IDSGT

    Planned class of eleven? It was originally a planned class of twelve in the first place.

  • Secundius

    With what are you going to protect her with. Your reducing the Destroyer Fleet, Drydocking the Cruiser Fleet, that only leave the virtually non-existing LCS Fleet. Again, how are you going to protect this ship, it’s crews and it’s Marine Corps assets.

    • vincedc

      Not to mentioned manning the ship and its support ships and aircraft, as the navy keeps reducing its numbers. Doesn’t make sense to build a ship if you don’t have the resources to deploy it. Sooner or later Congress is going to have to cut something to cover the reduction in funds. It can’t all fall on the soldiers and sailor that are being forced out or having their benefits reduces.

  • Cellar Dwellar

    Please correct the factual error in your story. The Army Vice Chief of Staff General John F. Campbell was nominated to replace Gen Dunford in Afghanistan.

  • Waldez

    What the General doesn’t understand is that the Navy does not have the Engineering Sections to operate these ships. Standards have slipped so low below decks that the least intelligent, least motivated, least competent are causing many the issues which have plagued this class. Right now it takes civilian contractors to keep these ships moving due to slack maintenance and just basic lack of Engineering skill in the present Navy. Maybe the idea is to have 12 to keep 6 seaworthy, even numbers – 2 for 1.