Home » Aviation » Marine Joint Strike Fighter on Track to Meet 2015 Goal


Marine Joint Strike Fighter on Track to Meet 2015 Goal

By:
Published: • Updated:
F-35B Lightning II aircraft lands aboard USS Wasp (LHD-1) in August 2013. US Navy Photo

F-35B Lightning II aircraft lands aboard USS Wasp (LHD-1) in August 2013. US Navy Photo

The U.S. Marine Corps’ F-35B short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) version of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is making good progress toward meeting its July 2015 initial operational capability (IOC) date according to company officials.

“They’re working on the last test release of Block 2B software capabilities,” Eric Van Camp, Lockheed’s domestic F-35 business development director, told USNI News on May 30. “They anticipate that testing will be complete late this year in November or December.”

The Marine Corps intends to declare the F-35B operational with interim Block 2B capabilities in July 2015. The Block 2B configuration includes basic data-fusion capabilities including data-links and a limited suite of weapons including the Raytheon AIM-120 advanced medium range air-to-air missiles (AMRAAM), 500lbs GBU-12 laser-guided bombs, and 1000lbs GBU-32 Joint Direct Attack Munitions.

One sign of progress Van Camp pointed to was that an F-35B test aircraft successfully engaged two target drones simultaneously with two AIM-120s over the Point Mugu test range in California on May 27.

In addition to weapons capability, the Block 2B configuration will also afford operational pilots the ability to use more of the F-35B’s flight envelope. Currently, F-35B training aircraft operating with the Block 2A software are restricted to 450 knots calibrated airspeed (KCAS), Mach 0.9, 18 degrees angle of attack and 4.5Gs.

However, with the delivery of Block 2B, the aircraft will be cleared to operate at 550 knot KCAS, Mach 1.2, 50 degrees angle of attack and 5.5G, Van Camp said. However, the F-35B will not be cleared to its full 630 knots KCAS, Mach 1.6, and 7Gs envelope until Block 3F is delivered. Further, with Block 2B, the aircraft’s maximum ceiling will be limited to 40,000ft rather than the full 50,000ft ceiling required for the full Block 3F operational capability.

After the Block 2B testing is complete, U.S. government analysts will have to pour over the test data to release the software to the operational fleet. “That fleet release will be in the spring,” Van Camp said. He added that the software looks to be on track to meet the Marines’ IOC date.

But software is not the biggest potential pitfall facing the Marines in their quest to declare the F-35B operational. Both JSF program manager Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan and Marine Corps’ deputy commandant for aviation Lt. Gen. Robert Schmidle testified before Congress in March that modifying the existing F-35B fleet to operational standards in time for IOC would be the greater challenge.

Those hardware upgrades are collectively called “Group 1 modifications”, Van Camp said. There are about 57 individual modifications included in that package.
“Those inductions and work continues to improve on a daily basis,” he said.
However Group 1 modifications do not include a more comprehensive structural upgrade needed to rectify an airframe durability problem that has cropped up in recent months.

Those modifications will be added later in the depot or on the production line—either that, or an aircraft might receive an entirely redesigned bulkhead when it is being built. “All of those [fielded] airplanes at some point in time will have to be modified before they get to a certain number of flight hours,” Van Camp said. “Right now, some of those modifications are not required for several years.”

While the Marines continue their march towards operational capability with the F-35B, which means a minimum of 10 deployable aircraft along with trained pilots and maintenance crews, there are still unanswered questions about operationally testing the JSF prior to that IOC date. “The government is going through discussions right now about what kind of operational tests will occur with the release of Block 2B,” Van Camp said.

The Marine Corps, which is the final authority on declaring the F-35B operational or not, referred questions about operational testing to the F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO). JPO officials did not respond to attempts to contact them.

An F-35B Lightning II aircraft takes off from the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD-1). US Navy Photo

An F-35B Lightning II aircraft takes off from the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD-1). US Navy Photo

But even as the F-35 integrated test team continues work on Block 2B, work is continuing on the follow-on Block 3i and Block 3F software packages. Test flights recently started on the U.S. Air Force’s F-35A variant with Block 3i—which is a rehosted version of Block 2B operating on new processors called Technology Refresh-2 (TR-2), Van Camp said.

While currently Lockheed does not anticipate adding additional capabilities in Block 3i, the program is exploring that possibility. “There have been some discussions about additional capabilities that are resident there,” Van Camp said. “The original intent was that 3i was largely a rehosting of Block 2B on a different set of hardware.”

The Air Force expects to declare the F-35A operational with the Block 3i software in August 2016. Eventually, all of the existing F-35 aircraft that have been delivered with the older computer hardware will be retrofitted with the new processors.

The U.S. Navy, however, is the lone holdout and will not declare the F-35C operational until August 2018.

  • ELP

    Great LM-JSF/PO talking points. I forgot for a bit that this was USNI. Any-who, there are still significant program risks with this aircraft. USMC IOC will be nothing more than a gimmick including that there is no working gun-pod. If there is a war during IOC, it will need to be escorted by other existing aircraft types because it is unsurvivable. Especially against emerging threats. To date–going on to 13 years after contract award–demonstration of how to change the $27M each F135 motor and lift-fan appliances aboard ship has not happened. KPPs for the aircraft are in the high 90pc range for mission capability rates. How is that going? In the end, the Harrier gives more reliable, capability to a joint theater commander. Hardly progress.

  • CharleyA

    LM has been heavy on the press releases of late, better to influence the full House Appropriations Committee and their take on the budget.