Home » Budget Industry » Griffin Missile Reaches Initial At Sea Operating Capability


Griffin Missile Reaches Initial At Sea Operating Capability

By:
Published:
Updated:
Testing of the Mk-60 Patrol Costal Griffin Missile System. US Navy Image.

Testing of the Mk-60 Patrol Costal Griffin Missile System. US Navy Image.

The missile the U.S. Navy plans to use in early versions of the Littoral Combat Ship surface warfare mission package and on Cyclone class patrol craft has reached initial operating capability (IOC) for its first use at sea, missile maker Raytheon announced Tuesday.

The IOC of the MK-60 Patrol Costal Griffin Missile System follows a series of tests that began in March of 2012, including testing aboard Cyclone PCs.

“IOC signals the beginning of improved ship self-defense on the Patrol Coastal fleet and provides an immediate response to potential maritime threats, especially small craft on the move,” said Capt. Mike Ladner, Major Program Manager Surface Ship Weapons, U.S. Navy Integrated Warfare Systems in the Tuesday statement.

The AGM-176 Griffin — a long time staple of U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) — is about three feet long, carries a 13-pound warhead, guided by a laser designator and has a range of about 5 miles.

The Griffin IIB was floated by the Navy in 2011 as a replacement to the over cost and underperforming Non-Line of Sight Launch (NLOS) missile system that Navy the initially planned to put onto the LCS surface warfare package.

The service subsequently tested the missile with the Cyclones and plans to continue testing with the LCS in 2015, NAVSEA told USNI News in August.

The missile, in its maritime role, will be focused on the fast attack craft (FAC)/fast inshore attack craft (FIAC) threat the Navy has identified as a threat to surface ships if used in swarms.

  • Tony

    CYCLONEs: OK; LCS: stupid waste of time and money. I thought we killed this for LCS?!?

    • Ctrot

      Ending the LCS program doesn’t mean scrapping the ships already built.

    • El_Sid

      In effect it’s a placeholder whilst they procure something with better range (naval Brimstone being the obvious alternative). But it gives them something to go bang whilst they develop the combat system.

  • NavySubNuke

    5 miles – wow. I’m sure our potential adversaries are shaking in their boots over this one. What exactly are they supposed to hit with this? It is overpowered to take out pirates and vastly under powered to take out any real ships. Or are we going to say this is for “shore bombardment”? Thank God the navy doesn’t have any real needs so we can waste money integrating things like this onto show-off paper tiger ships.

  • Sandy

    this is a good start, but the PC’s should also be equipped with either the 54 or 76 mm guns….the hydrofoil fleet still has the latter..transfer them to the PC’s….having ridden on these back during the Haitian vacation in 94, we always were concerned that they had little defensive capability or support for SEALs going ashore in a call-for-fire.